Your Favourite Game Got a Sequel and They Ruined It

The mechanics got smoother. The soul got lost.

What do you do when the sequel finally lands and it’s a watered-down shadow of what you loved?

You waited years. The announcement trailer dropped. The name was familiar. The logo made your eyebrow twitch. But still, you hoped. You wanted it to be the return. The comeback. The thing you didn’t know you still needed.

And then it launched.

And you knew – ten minutes in – that they’d broken it.

Not catastrophically. Not in a way you could scream about in a refund ticket. It worked. The menus loaded. The controls felt slick. The frame rate was smooth. But none of it mattered. It wasn’t your game anymore. It wore the same name, but it had nothing underneath.

Take Supreme Commander 2. The first SupCom was a monster. Massive scale. Complex resource management. Real strategic zoom. It was messy, overwhelming, brilliant. You needed to manage the whole war, not just one screen. It made you feel like you were in charge of an industrial machine that ran on metal, power, and constant panic.

SupCom 2 stripped it all back. Smaller maps. Simpler units. Faster matches. Strategic zoom was still there, but it didn’t feel like the same tool. You could tell they wanted it to be more accessible, and maybe they succeeded at that. But in the process, they lost what made it worth playing. It became a different game. Easier to learn, easier to forget.

That’s the story with most bad sequels. They get nervous. The rough edges of the first game become problems to fix. The quirks become bugs. The mechanics that gave it personality get shaved off in favour of “streamlined” systems. Suddenly everything’s tied to unlocks or level trees. Every feature has been through a focus group. Every bit of charm has been professionally removed.

Dungeon Keeper 2 kept the tone but dropped the bite. Deus Ex: Invisible War gave everyone the same ammo and hoped no one would notice. SimCity 2013 was a disaster dressed in slick UI and server errors. X-COM: The Bureau decided to be a shooter and forgot to be X-COM. And we don’t even need to talk about Dawn of War 2. That one still hurts.

The sequel trap is always the same. They think they’re chasing a bigger audience. They want to bring in new players. So they water it down. They file off anything that might confuse someone. And what’s left is a smooth, bland, forgettable game that feels like it was built by committee.

There’s always some line in the marketing that gives it away. “We’ve listened to feedback.” “We’ve made the game more approachable.” “We’ve modernised the formula.” None of those things are inherently bad. But they’re not goals. They’re symptoms. And when they’re treated like vision statements, the result is a sequel that technically works and emotionally fails.

The worst part? You don’t notice right away. At first, you think it’s fine. You go through the motions. You try to enjoy it. You tell yourself it’s just different, not worse. But the more you play, the more you realise: the spark’s gone. The weird little systems. The broken-but-interesting mechanics. The personality. All gone. In its place is a game that feels like it was made in a lab. Safe. Clean. Boring.

And you still bought it.

That’s the insult, really. You were the fan. You kept the first game alive. You recommended it. You played it for years. And when they made a sequel, they aimed it at someone else. Someone newer. Someone easier to please.

Sometimes you go back and replay the original. Just to remind yourself what they used to get right. Other times, you delete the sequel and move on. You don’t rage. You don’t review bomb. You just leave. Quietly disappointed.

Because it’s not just that they made a worse game. It’s that they made a worse version of something you used to love.

Which sequel killed your enthusiasm and did anything ever replace it?

Playing games badly on Twitch. Online Now. Sometimes we play games on Twitch. Currently Offline.

Discover more from Grumpy Old Gamer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading